Telangana urges Centre to reject Andhra’s ToR proposal for modified Polavaram Project

Hyderabad: Telangana Irrigation, Food, and Civil Supplies Minister Capt. N. Uttam Kumar Reddy has written to Union Environment Minister Bhupender Yadav, urging him to reject the proposal for Terms of Reference (ToR) sought by Andhra Pradesh for the modified Polavaram Irrigation Project (PIP).

He alleged that the AP government’s actions represent consistent violations of environmental clearances and tribunal allocations, calling them detrimental to riparian interests and legally untenable.

In his letter, Uttam Kumar Reddy stated that Andhra Pradesh has carried out significant deviations in both the Krishna and Godavari basins by expanding the scope of several components of the PIP, in violation of the permissions granted by the Godavari Water Disputes Tribunal Award (GWDTA) and the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC).

He recalled that the Polavaram project originally received Environmental Clearance from the MoEF under letter No. J-12011/74/2005-IA-1 dated October 25, 2005. However, the Andhra Pradesh government later implemented extensive changes without obtaining fresh clearance, prompting the Ministry to issue a ‘Stop Work Order’ on February 8, 2011. Although the order was issued due to the unapproved changes in the project’s scope, it was kept in abeyance and has been repeatedly extended, most recently until July 2, 2026. This allowed the works to continue despite objections raised not only by Telangana but also by Odisha and Chhattisgarh.

The Minister pointed out that the Polavaram project, after being granted `National Project’ status by the Government of India, continues to receive reimbursement of expenditures, but only for components that were approved under the original scope. “Yet the AP government has proceeded with major infrastructural modifications,” he wrote.

Uttam Kumar Reddy referred to the Supreme Court’s order dated September 6, 2022, which observed that “there are some technical reports available, but more may be required depending on the expansion of the project. Similarly, the issue of the environmental clearances would also have to be addressed.”

The Court had also suggested that the Minister of Jal Shakti and MoEF&CC play a pioneering role by convening a meeting of all stakeholders to resolve the contentious issues.

The Minister warned that AP has gone far beyond the approved project parameters. “The connectivity to draw water from the head sluice of the Polavaram Right Main Canal (PIPRMC) is now being designed for 40,000 cusecs, while the original design was for 20,000 cusecs. Twin tunnels, each with a discharge capacity of 20,000 cusecs, are under execution, and the infrastructure at the headworks has already been created accordingly,” he pointed out.

He added that the PIPRMC is being executed with a drawal capacity of 17,560 cusecs against the DPR-approved 11,654 cusecs. Similarly, the Polavaram Left Main Canal (PIPLMC) is being constructed with the same 17,560 cusecs capacity, though only 8,123 cusecs were originally approved. He stressed that these changes in drawal capacities and the “extensive alterations in the dimensional features of the project components” amount to a complete redesign of the project, undertaken without requisite clearances or approvals.

The Minister strongly urged the MoEF&CC not to undertake any appraisal of the Andhra Pradesh government’s project proposal in the forthcoming meeting of the Expert Appraisal Committee (EAC). “Given all the above, especially in the interest of justice, it is requested not to undertake any appraisal of this project proposal and outrightly reject the grant of ToR in the upcoming meeting of EAC,” he concluded.

For follow-up and necessary action, copies of the letter have been marked to the Secretary, Ministry of Jal Shakti; Chairman, Central Water Commission (CWC); CEO of the Polavaram Project Authority (PPA); and the Engineer-in-Chief (General) of Telangana.

In the note to the Jal Shakti Secretary, Uttam Kumar Reddy emphasized that the project is under execution with enormous changes to scope, highlighting that both the PIPRMC and PIPLMC are being implemented far beyond their sanctioned capacities and in contradiction to tribunal and TAC guidelines. He stated that Andhra Pradesh must be restrained from proceeding further with the modified project works.